Mission Statement

Sheer Progress is an endeavor designed to inform the public of the many political issues facing the world at large, from. We allow for political and civil discourse through the use of our forum, and encourage our members to share their views. We encourage our members to contact their elected representatives, and share their view, opinions, and wishes. Too often our representatives, once elected, no longer pay close enough attention to their constituents. We believe that our members help elect those officials, and in kind, deserve the right to be heard.

Congressional Contacts

 

Links

electoral-vote.com 

Obamatravel.org

Barack Obama Website

Use this code to link us from your site!


 

 

 

___________________________

Managing Editor/Administrator

Katie P.


Co-Administrators

Karen Jackson
Randall Thomas


Contributing Writers

CK
Rob Probst
Randall Thomas


Graphic Design

Rob Probst


_____________________________

The McCain Campaign Tries to Obfuscate: The True Elitism
    by K. Probst

September 10, 2008

The term "elitism" has been used to describe Barack Obama throughout the campaign, his "guns and religion" comment used against him to portray him as out of touch and "not one of us". So far, McCain's camp has been only moderately successful painting Obama as a do-nothing, inexperienced orator, whose patriotism is in question. While the Reverend Wright association remained a thorn in Obama's side, he managed to stay ahead in the polls and return to the issues at hand because McCain had no new message and his increasing number of gaffes were calling his competence into question. The Republican's conservative base abandoned McCain and attendance at his townhall meetings was thin.

With Sarah Palin now on the ticket and the attention revolving around her, McCain is barely noticeable, his regressive views and his lack of mental clarity hidden by her self-entitled "pitbull with lipstick" personality. The Conservative base, which seems to be focused narrowly on the abortion issue and gun-ownership rights, has now come back to him. One has to wonder how Americans are not seeing that Obama was correct about his "guns and religion" comment.

According to MSM, Rove has come back on a "part-time basis" to advise the McCain campaign. Rove specializes in taking the worst of the Republican's weaknesses and mirroring that onto the Democratic Candidate. They've also taken the strengths of Obama and have tried to claim those characteristics as their own. All throughout the campaign season, Obama has been condemned as the candidate of no experience, yet McCain picked the least qualified on his short list of VP candidates. PUMA and other similar groups were used by the RNC to depict Obama as sexist, yet McCain picked Sarah Palin to draw in women voters, a direct insult to the intelligence of Hillary supporters. Obama, who has used the word "change" has now had his message stolen by a clearly "no change" candidate. Ads came out attacking Obama's popularity, comparing him to mindless superstars, but Republican pundits are now openly calling Sarah Palin a rockstar. Now they are stooping to their typical lows by lying about Obama's policies and twisting his words to use them against him. The latest in a series of lies is the claim that Obama's "lipstick on a pig" comment was directed at Sarah Palin. McCain used this phrase himself earlier this year (see video below). Obama is now being criticized by MSM for not taking a stronger stand, but if he did, wouldn't that enable the Republican party to obfuscate the issues with petty distractions? Obama needs to find a balance between drawing voters back in to the issues and continue to show his strength by standing up for himself and the Democratic party.

Obama has faith in the American people that they will see through this obfuscation and vote in their best interests. He has continually said that he believes the American people are smart enough to make the right decision. McCain's camp is using trickery and treating the American public like mindless sheep who will have their attentions easily diverted by tabloid-type attacks. So, who is the true elitist?

Cost of the War in Iraq
(JavaScript Error)
.
THE LATEST FROM:
Moreover political columnists; BBC News; Dave Barry's Blog; Funny Quotes of the Day; Reuters: Oddly Enough; Guardian Unlimited; Radio Free USA; TalkLeft; Amnesty International; Team Amber Alert; Informed Comment


Scroll too slow? Mouseover the bottom edge of the news frame and click arrow on bottom for next story or top for previous story.
 
 
 


McCain misrepresents Obama's tax proposals again. And again, and again

By Brooks Jackson | factcheck.org
Aug 9, 2008 | Updated: 12:35 p.m. ET Aug 9, 2008

McCain released three new ads with multiple false and misleading claims about Obama's tax proposals.

A TV spot claims Obama once voted for a tax increase "on people making just $42,000 a year." That's true for a single taxpayer, who would have seen a tax increase of $15 for the year – if the measure had been enacted. But the ad shows a woman with two children, and as a single mother, she would not have been affected unless she made more than $62,150. The increase that Obama once supported as part of a Democratic budget bill is not part of his current tax plan anyway.

A Spanish-language radio ad claims the measure Obama supported would have raised taxes on "families" making $42,000, which is simply false. Even a single mother with one child would have been able to make $58,650 without being affected. A family of four with income up to $90,000 would not have been affected.

The TV ad claims in a graphic that Obama would "raise taxes on middle class." In fact, Obama's plan promises cuts for middle-income taxpayers and would increase rates only for persons with family incomes above $250,000 or with individual incomes above $200,000.

The radio ad claims Obama would increase taxes "on the sale of your home." In fact, home-sale profits of up to $500,000 per couple would continue to be exempt from capital gains taxes. Very few sales would see an increase under Obama's proposal to raise the capital gains rate.

A second radio ad, in English, says, "Obama has a history of raising taxes" on middle-class Americans. But that's false. It refers to a vote that did not actually result in a tax increase and could not have done so.

These ads continue what's become a pattern of misrepresentation by the McCain campaign about his opponent's tax proposals.

Analysis
Sen. John McCain's campaign released the 30-second spot Aug. 8. Campaign spokesman Brian Rogers said the ad would be running in Colorado, Iowa, Michigan, Missouri, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin.

John McCain 2008 Ad: "Painful"

Announcer: Life in the spotlight must be grand, but for the rest of us times are tough.

Obama voted to raise taxes on people making just $42,000.

He promises more taxes on small business, seniors, your life savings, your family.

Painful taxes, hard choices for your budget. Not ready to lead. That's the real Obama.

McCain: I'm John McCain and I approved this message.

The ad continues McCain's pattern of misrepresenting Sen. Barack Obama's tax proposals as falling on middle-income families. It claims that Obama "promises more taxes on small businesses, seniors, your life savings, your family." But that's untrue for the vast majority of small businesses, seniors and individual taxpayers, who would see their taxes go down under Obama's actual plan. He proposes to increase taxes only for those with more than $250,000 in family income, or $200,000 in individual income.

Furthermore, if viewers are to believe that the woman in McCain's ad is married and files taxes jointly with her husband, the couple could make as much as $90,000 this year without being affected. And anyway, as noted earlier, Obama isn't proposing to implement any such increase in the 25 percent bracket.

(Tax tables for 2008 can be found here, including the tax brackets, exemptions and exclusions that apply to income earned this year.)

The TV ad also says that Obama "promises more taxes on small business, seniors, your life savings, your family." This statement is simply not true for the vast majority of viewers who will see it. Obama, in fact, promises to deliver a $1,000 tax cut for families making up to $150,000 a year, and he says he would increase income tax rates, capital gains tax rates and taxes on dividends only for those with family incomes over $250,000 a year, or for single taxpayers making over $200,000.


Tax Deception en Español
McCain also released a 60-second, Spanish-language radio ad Aug. 8 with additional deceptions, claiming that Obama would raise taxes on listeners' income, savings and home sales, and falsely claiming that he had voted to increase taxes on "families" making $42,000 a year.

John McCain 2008 Radio Ad: "Are You Ready For Obama?"
(English translation supplied by McCain campaign)

Announcer: With the economy as bad as it is, gas prices going up, home foreclosures, and jobs being lost, we need to be careful about who we pick as our next president.

No doubt, Barack Obama is a popular figure, a celebrity who says the right thing. But will he do the right thing?

So here's the question you need to ask yourself, in these tough economic times, are you ready for a president who voted for higher income taxes on working families making $42,000 a year?

Are you ready for Barack Obama, for his tax plans that will hurt senior citizens?

Are you ready for the higher taxes on income, savings and the sale of your home that Barack Obama promises?

It's not that you're not ready. Barack Obama is not ready yet. Because when it comes to the economy, experience matters, and he just doesn't have it.

He says he'll give you change, but that's what he'll leave you with.

McCain: I'm John McCain and I approve this message.

The English-language translation supplied by the McCain campaign says Obama voted for higher taxes on "working families" making $42,000 a year. (In Spanish, it says Obama "voto para aumentarle los impuestos a las familias que ganan 42,000 dolares al año.) The Spanish for "working" does not actually appear in the ad, but either way the claim is false.

As noted, what Obama once supported would have increased taxes for a single taxpayer at that income level, but not for a family. The smallest possible "family" would be a single parent with a single child, and such a single parent would have to make $58,650 to have been affected. As noted, a family of four would have to make $90,000. And in any case, Obama's plan would cut taxes for families at all those levels, not increase them.

The ad also falsely claims Obama proposes higher taxes on "the sale of your home." In fact, neither Obama nor McCain propose any change in the current exemption for home sales, which allow all profits to go untaxed up to $500,000 for a couple or $250,000 for a single person, provided that the home has been a primary residence at least two of the previous five years. Obama has proposed an unspecified increase in the tax rate for capital gains, but this would fall only on home-sale profits that exceed the current exclusion and would therefore affect only a very small percentage of all sellers.

False "History"
Later the same day, the McCain campaign released another 60-second radio ad, titled "Recipe." This one is in English, and it's also misleading.

John McCain 2008 Radio Ad: "Recipe"

Announcer: Life in the spotlight must be grand for Barack Obama. But is he ready to lead in tough economic times?

Official records document, Barack Obama has a history of raising taxes – even on middle class Americans making just $42,000 a year.

If elected president, Obama's promises would mean even more taxes on income, electricity, oil, small business, seniors, your life savings, your family.

Painful taxes when times are tough enough.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal calls Obama's ideas "a recipe for economic disaster."

The Washington Post says Obama's policies are "poorly crafted" and will result in "higher prices at the pump."

And The Wall Street Journal reports Obama's plans will "stunt small business" and threaten "America's economic competitiveness."

More taxes. Higher gas prices. A recipe for economic disaster.

That's the real Obama.

McCain: I'm John McCain and I approved this message.

Announcer: Paid for by John McCain 2008.

It says: "Official records document, Barack Obama has a history of raising taxes – even on middle class Americans making just $42,000 a year." But that's false. No taxes were increased, and the vote that the McCain campaign refers to could not by itself have resulted in any increase on anybody.

The measure for which Obama voted was a budget bill for fiscal 2009. Budget bills set revenue and spending targets for appropriations and tax-writing committees, but don't by themselves legislate any changes in taxes or spending.

It is correct to say that Obama's vote showed a preference for the Democratic budget package, which included an increase in the 25 percent tax bracket, over the Republican alternatives. But it is false to say that this amounts to "a history of raising taxes," since no taxes were actually increased. It is also misleading, as we've noted, because Obama has campaigned consistently on a promise to cut taxes for most taxpayers while raising them only on the most affluent.

A Continuing Pattern of Deceit
These three new McCain ads continue what has become a pattern of deceit, with McCain repeatedly misrepresenting what Obama is proposing.

Here are some of McCain's previous false claims, with links to previous analyses:

- McCain falsely claimed Obama's plan would increase taxes on 23 million small-business owners, when the vast majority of them would get a cut. Any increase would actually fall only on the most affluent, a few hundred thousand business owners.

McCain falsely claimed Obama "says he'll raise taxes on electricity," though Obama has said no such thing and his tax plan contains no proposal for a tax on electricity.

Sources
"Individual Income Tax Brackets, 1945 - 2008." 4 November 2007. Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, 7 July 2008.

U.S. Internal Revenue Service, "Topic 701 - Sale of Your Home," Web site accessed 8 Aug 2008.

Len Burman, et. al. "An Updated Analysis of the 2008 Presidential Candidates' Tax Plans." Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Revised 23 July 2008.




  

 

 

Google